John Stossel - Now Playing:

Stossel Confronts Politicians about Corruption Allegations
Stossel Confronts Politicians about Corruption Allegations
Stossel Confronts Politicians about Corruption Allegations
Stossel Confronts Politicians about Corruption Allegations
Stossel Confronts Politicians about Corruption Allegations
Stossel Confronts Politicians about Corruption Allegations

Stossel Confronts Politicians about Corruption Allegations

John Stossel - 2018-06-05

An apartment developer paid millions for prime real estate in Edgewater, New Jersey, real estate with a beautiful view of Manhattan. Nearly 2,000 apartments would be built. The developer also offered to build public parks, parking, a ferry terminal, and a pier, all at no cost to taxpayers. But Edgewater's mayor and city council said: No. You may not build! --------- Subscribe to my YouTube channel: youtube.com/johnstossel Like me on Facebook: facebook.com/JohnStossel/ Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/johnstossel --------- That's not that unusual; local officials often keep new developments out. But in this case, they also voted to seize the developer's land using eminent domain. John Stossel asks: Why would they do that? The developer says he knows. He filed a lawsuit alleging a 'corrupt relationship' between politicians in Edgewater and an established developer, Fred Daibes. The lawsuit says Daibes was upset because he wanted the property himself: 'Daibes even directly threatened Plaintiff's representatives that they 'should have come to me in the beginning. I own and built this town. Now it will be condemned; I am your neighbor on all sides.'' The lawsuit then lays out alleged corruption: The mayor lives in a Fred Daibes' apartment building, where he gets a subsidized rent. (The mayor denies that.) Four city council members also get loans from a Daibes-controlled bank. As the lawyer tells John Stossel, many have: 'ongoing relationships with [Daibes]. Jobs... undervalued rentals... loans for their business purposes through a bank that Mr. Daibes started and has the controlling interest in.' But the mayor and city council say they have a legitimate reason for blocking the development. It 'would kill the infrastructure. It's just too much,' McPartland told the New York Times. But then why did they approve an even bigger development for Fred Daibes? It's twice as tall as the project the city council blocked. That sounded like possible corruption to Stossel. Neither Daibes, the mayor, nor anyone on the city council agreed to be interviewed for this story. So Stossel went to a town council meeting to see if the politicians would answer questions. 'Are you on the take?' Stossel asks. He lays out some of the allegations. But the council members and mayor don't respond to the issues. Their lawyer criticized Stossel's 'objectionable tone' and advised the mayor not to comment. 'You've had your time. You may sit down,' the mayor eventually tells Stossel. That was that. Stossel says, Developers can't tell other developers 'you can't build here' unless they have cronies in government. That's not capitalism, that's crony capitalism. Or corruption. That harms people who now won't be able to live in apartments near Manhattan. It harms the developer who loses a multi-million dollar investment. It harms citizens of Edgewater who lose out on free parks and other amenities.