News & Social Media Writers Needed - CLICK HERE.

Andrew Napolitano - Now Playing:

Napolitano GONE MISSING!!!
Napolitano GONE MISSING!!!
Napolitano GONE MISSING!!!
Napolitano GONE MISSING!!!
Napolitano GONE MISSING!!!
Napolitano GONE MISSING!!!

Napolitano GONE MISSING!!!

Kenn Daily - 2017-03-21

NEXT ? BRITONS CALL FOR DEATH PENALTY FOR... goo.gl/uj0hV7 SUBSCRIBE ? youtube.com/dailykenn FACEBOOK ?facebook.com/dailykenncom/ TWITTER ?twitter.com/DailyKenncom KENN SINGS ? goo.gl/hDm6cd KENN'S LAWS ?goo.gl/48EoBp KENN ON CLASHDAILY ? goo.gl/IzotGS ATTRIBUTION [FAIR USE] ? thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/judge-napolitano-pulled-fox-news-british-intel-wiretap-claims/#disqus_thread latimes.com/business/hollywood/la-fi-ct-napolitano-fox-news-20170320-story.html Fox News did not respond to inquiries about Napolitano's status Monday. Napolitano was conspicuously missing from the network's coverage of the confirmation hearings on Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch -- an event in which he typically would have played a significant role. He has not been on the air since Thursday. People familiar with the situation who could speak only on the condition of anonymity said Napolitano is not expected to be on Fox News Channel any time in the near future. Napolitano was not available for comment. But Napolitano said on one program that 'Fox News has spoken to intelligence community members who believe that surveillance did occur, that it was done by British intelligence.' Fox News, however, did no such thing, forcing its anchors to walk back Napolitano's statement. 'Fox News knows of no evidence of any kind that the now-president of the United States was surveilled at any time, in any way,' Shepard Smith told viewers Friday. In a statement read on the Fox News program 'MediaBuzz' on Sunday, Napolitano defended his comments. He said he 'reported what the sources told me, reported it accurately and I do believe the substance of what they told me.' Copyright Disclaimer: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on events deemed newsworthy. Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976 allows for fair use for purposes including criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 reads in part, 'Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.' copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html